Laser treatment for adverse reactions to injectable facial filling: a systematic review.

Facial filling is widespread in society, albeit associated with inherent risks. This review analyzes clinical studies using laser therapy for filler complications to assess its safety and efficacy as an alternative treatment. A literature search was conducted up until April 2023, encompassing five different databases: PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Medline, to find clinical trials addressing patients who underwent laser treatment for adverse reactions to injectable facial filling. The outcome variables were the clinical assessment of the lesion and the occurrence of post-intervention complications/sequelae. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. In total, six studies were included, all classified as having a "moderate risk" of bias. A total of 533 patients underwent laser treatment for adverse reactions to injectable facial fillers. The diode laser was the most frequently utilized equipment, with positive results reported in five studies. Among all treated patients, 96.24% achieved partial or complete resolution, 0.22% experienced some sequelae or complications, and only 0.01% showed no improvement. Laser treatment can eliminate the necessity for surgical intervention for adverse reactions to injectable facial fillers, resulting in partial or complete improvement of the condition.

Expression of genes associated with the biosynthetic pathways of abscisic acid, gibberellin, and ethylene during the germination of lettuce seeds.

Seed germination and dormancy are complex phenomena that are controlled by many genes and environmental factors. Such genes are indicated by phytohormones that interact with each other, and may cause dormancy or promote seed germination. The objective of this study was to investigate gene expression associated with the biosynthetic pathways of abscisic acid (ABA), gibberellic acid (GA), and ethylene (ET) in dormant and germinated lettuce seeds. The expressions of LsNCED, LsGA3ox1, and ACO-B were evaluated in germinating and dormant seeds from the cultivars Everglades, Babá de Verão, Verônica, Salinas, Colorado, and Regina 71. The expressions of LsNCED, LsGA3ox1, and ACO-B were related to the biosynthesis of ABA, GA, and ET, respectively; therefore, the presence of these substances depends on genotype. LsNCED expression only occurred in dormant seeds, and was connected to dormancy. LsGA3ox1expression only occurred in germinated seeds, and was connected to germination. The ACO-B gene was involved in ET biosynthesis, and was expressed differently in germinated and dormant seeds, depending on the genotype, indicating different functions for different characteristics. Furthermore, sensitivity to phytohormones appeared to be more important than the expression levels of LsNCED, LsGA3ox1, or ACO-B.

Comparison of behavioral and clinical effects of intravenous amitraz or romifidine administration in horses / Comparação de efeitos comportamentais e clínicos da administração intravenosa de amitraz ou romifidina em eqüinos

Clinical and behavioral effects of intravenous injection of romifidine (60mcg/kg) or amitraz (0.4mg/kg) were compared in six horses, over 120 min. Romifidine caused head ptosis (HP), reduced respiratory rate (RR) and ileo-cecal sphincter activity (IC) until 120 minutes; produced posture changes (PC) until 90 minutes, upper eyelid drop (ED) and sedation (SD) until 60 minutes, intestinal motion (IM) reduction and lower lip drop (LD) until 45 minutes. Amitraz reduced heart rate (HR), RR, IM and IC, and promoted HP, ED, LD, penis drop (PD) and sedation with posture changes until 120min. At 90min amitraz produced HP and ED more intensively than romifidine. The LD was similar between 45 and 60 minutes. Romifidine produced intense sedation at 10min while amitraz sedation was more significant between 90 and 120 minutes. It is concluded that both romifidine and amitraz can produce strong sedation until 60 and 120 minutes, respectively. Though amitraz sedation and posture changes had a later onset related to romifidine, these effects lasted longer

Compararam-se os efeitos sedativos e clínicos em seis eqüinos tratados com romifidina (60mcg/kg) ou amitraz (0,4mg/kg), pela via intravenosa, durante 120 minutos. A romifidina promoveu ptose da cabeça (PC), reduziu a freqüência respiratória (FR) e o movimento da válvula íleo-cecal (MC) durante 120 minutos, provocou alteração postural (AP) por 90 minutos, induziu ptose palpebral (PP) e sedação (SD) por 60 minutos, diminuiu a motilidade intestinal (MI) e causou ptose labial (PL) durante 45 minutos. O amitraz reduziu a freqüência cardíaca (FR), FR, MI e MC e provocou PC, PP, PL, prolapso peniano (PP) e sedação com alteração postural por 120 minutos. Aos 90 minutos, o amitraz induziu a PC e a PP mais intensamente que a romifidina; o mesmo ocorreu entre 45 e 60 minutos para PL. A romifidina produziu sedação maior aos 10 minutos; para o amitraz, a sedação foi mais intensa entre 90 e 120 minutos. Conclui-se que a romifidina e o amitraz produzem sedação intensa por 60 e 120 minutos, respectivamente. A sedação e as alterações posturais induzidas pelo amitraz foram de início tardio, porém tiveram maior duração

[Neuropathies of the spinal accessory nerve secondary to cervical surgery: clinical and electrophysiological study of 7 cases]. / Neuropatias do nervo acessório espinhal secundárias a cirurgias cervicais: estudo clínico e eletrofisiológico de sete casos.

After innervating the sternocleidomastoid muscle, the spinal accessory nerve emerges and down crosses the posterior cervical triangle to innervate the trapezius. At the posterior triangle, the nerve is closely related to local lymph nodes and may be injured by their enlargement or surgical removal. Injury to this nerve is uncommom. Most cases are iatrogenically due to surgical procedures in the posterior cervical triangle, often following lymph nodes biopsies or benign turmors approaches. We present seven cases of post-surgical related spinal accessory nerve injury and discuss its clinical and electrophysiologycal profiles. The major motor signs were shoulder drop and paresis to raise arm. Pain and sensory complaints were almost universal and most probably due to concomitant injury of cervical plexus cutaneous branches, which are in direct relation to the spinal accessory nerve in the posterior cervical triangle. Lesion type is usually axonotmesis, but varied degrees of compression by cicatricial spurs are observed in some patients. Surgical approach and nerve repair must be considered for pacients with delayed recovery.